|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 31
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 31 |
brokeda...your point is well taken, but
assuming all things being equal and the company installing knows what they are doing, then the same question still pertains.
which system is less problematic
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11 |
Assuming a system is properly programmed to perform within it's limitations and features...(sometimes a big assumption)...not all systems are created equally. Early Vodavi Infinite DVX were just plain crap, we experienced absurd amounts of out of box failures and the s/w was very buggy and poor. They improved the quality of the equipment with the DVX+ line...but it took them another few years to get the s/w debugged again.(I hate being a company's guinie pig, it makes ME look bad). I have worked on Iwatsu a long time, but never warmed up to the fact that they have also had to revise s/w so often to fix issues. I have done alot of work with both of these. I like the Nortel product because it is durable and stable. I haven't had the chance to work with the Avaya product much (pretty propriatory 'round here). Not a huge Comdial, Intertel or Toshiba fan...I've been called out to fix these systems alot after the original install company has ticked off their customer to the point that they are no longer welcome...I usually soon find out why. Don't want to rub anyone the wrong way..just droppin my 2 cents.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,436
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,436 |
Personally, I prefer Toshiba CTX. It can handle just about anything you can imagine within it's port capacity. PRI, VoIP, E&M, VM, QSIG, and so on. It's also pretty reliable, almost no out-of-box failures, remote programming, and physically durable.
Joe
---
No trees were harmed as a result of this posting; however, many electrons were severely inconvenienced.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,197 Likes: 2
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,197 Likes: 2 |
Best system we service hands down Tadiran Coral now Sprint Flexicom. Systems installed in 1983 can be upgraded, using existing backplanes and cards to latest versions and IP. No other system can say the same. Solid as a rock.
Worst system I have ever worked on was the Omega IV. I cannot tell you how crappy this system was/is.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,367
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,367 |
Must agree Tadiran ROCKS!
Worst system ... So many to choose
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,322
Posts638,969
Members49,779
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
1 members (Toner),
295
guests, and
83
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image from i26.servimg.com]](http://i26.servimg.com/u/f26/14/56/80/78/logo12.png){kind=logo}