|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,378 Likes: 13
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
|
Moderator-Vertical, Vodavi, 1A2, Outside Wire
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,378 Likes: 13 |
You might want to insist that they check with at&t's local plant manager and verify that the cable pair being used isn't half-tapped. I have one customer who had the same problems that is located less than a mile from the CO. When we first installed the system about 8 years ago, there were constant crashes, almost daily. I knew that GTE had half-tapped an existing cable to feed this building when it was constructed, so I just took a ride further down the road and followed the cable route (aerial).
Turns out that it continued about six more miles from my customer's site and yes, I finally had to open a pedestal to prove to them that the pair count was in fact half-tapped (GTE denied it). They agreed to cut the affected pairs dead to the field and it worked perfectly after that.
Until........
The customer downsized and eliminated one of their two PRIs. In (now) Verizon's usual fashion, they installed a new single circuit instead of just eliminating the second one as requested. Within a day, same song, second verse. It was crashing constantly and all that Verizon had to say was....Well, let's not even go there.
In a conference call with God only knows how many people, I was lucky enough to have a CO technician involved. He agreed to run a full test on the T1 at the frame for the night and give us the results in the morning. Oh boy was he surprised the next day in our conference call.
Although he was insistent that this was an F1 cable count, which it technically is, their plant records didn't show that my customer's cable count was a tap. I hate to think of the hundreds of hours of visits, emergency calls, conference calls, etc. that were wasted (once again). Once they moved our circuit back to the original pairs, everything has been fine.
Oh, by the way: Our affected cable pair was found to be bouncing around in the breeze; an aerial drop that fed a now-removed mobile home two miles away.
Sorry for the lengthy side-track, but I just thought I'd share this experience in an effort to give you some ammo. Vodavi has said to me many times that a problem with a PRI is always on the telco's end and I can say with certainty that this has always been the case for me. Good luck.
Ed Vaughn, MBSWWYPBX
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,821
Retired Moderator
|
Retired Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,821 |
Half tapping....I didn't think about that. Reminds me of the time long ago when a customer of mine with 22 pots lines in hunt that kept getting ring no answer. I argued with Bell Atlantic now you know who about it for days about whos fault it was. Turns out that when a truck drove by a ped down the street, the vibrations would shake the ped and one side of line 7 would disconnect from the screw termial on the wiring block in the ped thus opening up the hunt. The next truck to roll by would shake it again and it would start working. You can imagine how much fun this was.
www.myrandomviews "Old phone guys never die, they just get locked in some closet with an old phone system and forgotten about" Retired, taking photographs and hoping to fly one of my many kites.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,136
Moderator-Vodavi, Vertical, XBlue
|
Moderator-Vodavi, Vertical, XBlue
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,136 |
Ed. I agree with you. Any PRI problems that I have ever had were also always on the provider end. While I mentioned that I have had two bad boards in my past, one was obviously bad because it failed a local loop back test from the CSU. The 2nd board wasn't actually bad. It turned out to be that when I went to add the newest combo board, I needed to revert to the older revision because the XTS S/W ver 1.16 didn't support the newer one. That issue is found on older XTS posts in the forum. Neither fault occurred on an existing circuit that was previously in-service but only on new additions. And the 1st one was when I tried to use an old board that was removed from a previous installation. It had probably been mishandled somewhere along the way.
- Dave S. -
You can never appease your ideologue opponents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,722 Likes: 18
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,722 Likes: 18 |
All everyone has said is probably true (network trouble). Still is he's receiving yellows and that mean's the AT&T switch, no matter what kind it is, is loosing signal. So depending on what's on the circuit, as far as monitoring equipment goes, AT&T ought to be able to see that and narrow it down. At the very least they should be able to see the LOS at their switch. I'd think by now most of the NID's would be the smart type that they can pull PM data from also. I think I'd be doing a little more talking to AT&T to see if they have access to PM data.
Retired phone dude
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10 |
Thanks for the input, I'll mention this to AT&T tomorrow. They've escalated this to a cronic repair and are supposed to do more testing.
Question; is it necessary to have a csu? What would happen without it?
Thanks
Greg Veile
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,821
Retired Moderator
|
Retired Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,821 |
The pri will technically work without a csu but not as well. The csu helps to prevent jitter and signal loss.
www.myrandomviews "Old phone guys never die, they just get locked in some closet with an old phone system and forgotten about" Retired, taking photographs and hoping to fly one of my many kites.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,291
Posts638,815
Members49,767
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|