|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 339
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 339 |
Johnp,
Which are all the things I checked already. I'm going through all our customers to try and find an exact match and then compare option by option to find the problem. :bang:
Jon
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt"
Mark Twain
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 339
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 339 |
I found it....Staring at a problem doesn't help so after responses from this blog and a couple of cold ones I got back into programming and saw that when my brother programmed the EM card he put half the ports in COS 48 and half in COS 49 and when I looked at them in form 9 my eye skipped right past the 49. It had caller id enabled in it and after disabling it all calls forward properly.
It still is a little confusing though because it worked before the Telco changed their PRI... or at least the customer didn't notify of any problems.
Jon
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt"
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,291
Posts638,815
Members49,767
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
0 members (),
131
guests, and
360
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
