|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,171 Likes: 8
Spam Hunter
|
Spam Hunter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,171 Likes: 8 |
As described, nope.
No way the receiving party should be legally billed for the calls without giving consent to a Bell Canada (or some other provider's) operator (such as reverse charging).
Per Wikipedia:
425 - Unassigned
872 - Unassigned (Formerly Inmarsat)
061 - Australia
238 - Cape Verde
066 - Thailand
So this could be a spoofing situation. Of course Bell Canada would have to do a trace on the calls to see how they went through their network. Depending on the Central Office equipment, some part of the CDRs would indicate if the calls were to tagged as reverse bill.
Scary to think that a spoofer could manipulate CDR information so that the term party gets billed for a call.
Last edited by dexman; 01/20/13 03:53 PM.
I Love FEATURE 00
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,331
Posts639,014
Members49,783
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
0 members (),
137
guests, and
173
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
