web statisticsweb stats

Business Phone Systems

Support Service-Disabled Veterans!
Discount software from Direct Deals
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 341
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 341
Does anybody know if there is a specific regulation regarding the coexistence of alarm cabling (fire/buglar/etc.) in a cable tray with data/voice cabling?

I have never seen this done on commercial installations until now; generally, the alarm guys pick a totally independent path, including seperate conduit to the panel location.

My concern in two-fold: I have a situation where the alarm cablers wove between some of the communication cables in and out of the tray. They are running both parallel and right-angle to the communication cable. My first concern is EMI affecting the data cabling, second is the possibility of damage resulting from pulling across the data/voice cables.

I thought I had heard or read somewhere that there was a specific NEC reference on this. Or would this be a jurisdictional issue?

[This message has been edited by Rover88 (edited September 08, 2004).]

Atcom VoIP Phones
VoIP Demo

Best VoIP Phones Canada


Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 56
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 56
we had an alarm guy use our cat5 as pull string and pulled out our cable and put his in the conduit. yeah right!

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,725
Likes: 19
Member
****
Member
****
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 17,725
Likes: 19
Don't think you're going to find much in the way of EMI from alarm systems. As far as damage goes, shouldn't do any more damage than pulling a phone or data cable. Personally I don't see an ethics problem either. Now the using your cable for a pull wire is another issue to be settled behind the building.
Bill


Retired phone dude
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630
should not affect it, but they were being lazy not keeping their cable seperate from yours.


Z-man
Avaya SME Authorized Partner
www.omniofficetech.com
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,367
Member
*****
Member
*****
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,367
Class 2 and Class 3 Can exist together.

I have seen Inspected and Aproved cable trays. that had CATV,Data, Voice feeds, Fiber, Voice station, Fire, Security, Lighting control, and Line voltage.

The Line voltage was in Flex metal. That had to be physically separed. First Inspector said tied to one side would be good enough but a second inspector required a physical barrier be installed. That was fought and won.

In short Limited Energy can co-exist.
Further Info can be found in the NEC.


[Linked Image from i26.servimg.com]
TouchPoint Networks.

Serving the Northwest Since 1991
NEC Shoretel Zultys T3 Tadiran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,362
Member
*****
Member
*****
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,362
The only time I have had a problem with voice lines being close to alarm wires, was when the fire alarm system used a multiplexed loop instead of the good ole fashion EOL circuits. The data being transmited on the polling loop circuit played havoc with our phone system.(Nitsuko DS01 at the time) You could hear the data on nearly every phone in the system. Some burg alarms use multiplexed polling loops as well, but I have never had the situation where a burg panel has given me any trouble.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,101
JJ Offline
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,101
OSHEA had a regulation about class 3 and class 2 being in conduit/cable trays. I can not find specs right now, but it stated if alarm system had more than 48 VDC they can not be in same conduit and if in cable tray they had to be 3 inches apart. That is the standard we used in the military.

I have had long cable runs of over 1800 feet(main feed within warehouse) with both in conduit, because contractor made us for foire regulations. It caused transient problems and computer/phones did not work all the time. We installed a new feed not in there conduit and allll was well.

I have also had places where alarm company came in behind us and installed in same conduit (short runs though) with no problem.

I would say it is a gamble!!


If all else fails, use a BFH.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 90
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 90
codes and inspectors can be a bear when dealing with fire-alarm cabling.

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 581
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 581
i just tell the customer,engineer,architect,whoevers make the decisions. if hearing data on the voice circuits is not an issue go ahead and run en together. that gets you off the hook and probabley an extra when you have to fix the issue.
m


Moderated by  Silversam 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Newest Topics
New chat forum
by metelcom - 09/26/24 12:26 PM
CO assignment to station key
by SamL - 09/20/24 09:05 AM
SV9100 Yesterday's technology today...
by Carl Navarro - 09/19/24 08:29 AM
Forum Statistics
Forums84
Topics94,402
Posts639,369
Members49,808
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
Newest Members
DavidMirror, Si-14 LLC, SamL, xsh74, LukeE.
49,808 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Toner 17
dexman 10
pvj 5
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 250 guests, and 448 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Contact Us | Sponsored by Atcom: One of the best VoIP Phone Canada Suppliers for your business telephone system!| Terms of Service

Sundance Communications is not affiliated with any of the above manufacturers. Sundance Phone System Forums - VOIP & Cloud Phone Help
©Copyright Sundance Communications 1998 - 2024
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0