|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 903
Retired Moderator
|
Retired Moderator
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 903 |
Evidently I'm not the only one to find issues with the UC500. UC500 support issues It's kind of disturbing when you don't even understand what the problem is, much less how to fix it. re-INVITE dropped when CME with rtp-nte and CUE rtp-nte , Fixed CSCsz73632 Or how about this jewel: Access class routers (for example a 2811 or a 3825) would experience this crash. Symptoms of the crash are as follows: #1 sh version would contain the following: System returned to ROM by error - a Software forced crash, PC 0x40091930 at 07:32:18 GMT Fri Mar 30 2007 #2 show stack would contain the following: System was restarted by error - a Software forced crash, PC 0x40091930 at 07:32:18 GMT Fri Mar 30 2007 2800 Software (C2800NM-SPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(9)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Technical Support: https://www.cisco.com/techsupport Compiled Wed 30-Aug-06 16:22 by prod_rel_team Image text-base: 0x400B132C, data-base: 0x42C80000 Stack trace from system failure: FP: 0x4678D7A8, RA: 0x40091930 FP: 0x4678D7A8, RA: 0x4008F528 FP: 0x4678D7D0, RA: 0x400E06D4 FP: 0x4678D808, RA: 0x400B7340 FP: 0x4678D830, RA: 0x400CD47C FP: 0x4678D870, RA: 0x42C5F4E0 FP: 0x4678D890, RA: 0x40B723D8 FP: 0x4678E138, RA: 0x40B71A64 #3 Contents relating to log entries written in the crashinfo file would contain %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 10: Name=SEP0015C6245001 Load=4.0(03.01) Last=Failback %SYS-2-CHUNKBADREFCOUNT: Bad chunk reference count, chunk 4727F554 data 4728A328 refcount FFFFFFFF alloc pc 40B8FAA8. -Process= "Skinny Msg Server", ipl= 0, pid= 34 -Traceback= 0x414A8A98 0x400E06BC 0x400B7340 0x400CD47C 0x42C5F4E0 0x40B723D8 0x40B71A64 0x40B6EE64 0x426D50F0 0x426D50D4 chunk_diagnose, code = 3 chunk name is MallocLite current chunk header = 0x4728A318 data check, ptr = 0x4728A328 next chunk header = 0x4728A3A8 data check, ptr = 0x4728A3B8 previous chunk header = 0x4728A288 data check, ptr = 0x4728A298 If you see #1 through #3 and running 12.4(9)T or prior releases, then there is high probability that you are affected by this IOS bug. The resolution for this requires you to load 12.4(9)T2 OR 12.4(11)T or later IOS releases. For confirmation (if needed) OR if you are running a different IOS release, open a TAC case and provide the sh tech (taken from the enable mode) and TAC will be able to confirm if you are affected by this or something else. Workaround: None.Note the comment at the bottom. Somehow I suspect a lot of CGs don't know what that means, much less telephone techs. Is this the new world of telecom we're heading to? I don't think the transmission shop customer is going to care for paying for the all day service call because something like the above happened out of warranty and his desk phone quit. I'm hoping the vendor we are looking at has a good handle on these type of things.
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 149
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 149 |
Originally posted by rich30529: cabling upgrade requirements You can run VOIP on cat3. No problem.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444 |
Originally posted by brianl703: Originally posted by rich30529: cabling upgrade requirements You can run VOIP on cat3. No problem. Kinda defeats the purpose of "running on a network" huh! Scott
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444 |
Also, I saw earlier where TDM must be replaced every so often?? What about the fact that Cisco ( Can I Still Call Out), requires network hardware to be relaced every 3 years?
Just my .02
Scott
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 149
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 149 |
Cisco does not require network hardware to be replaced every 3 years, and in fact they continue to offer IOS downloads and documentation for equipment they haven't manufactured in over 10 years.
Yes, they offer documentation for equipment they don't even make anymore, to anyone who cares to look at it. That's why there are no "Cisco manuals" websites.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 149
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 149 |
Kinda defeats the purpose of "running on a network" huh! The best VOIP design separates the voice and data networks. That does not, however, mean that they cannot be connected together. This gets into more advanced network design, though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444 |
My point was that cat3 is NOT a supported network cable these days is it?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444 |
Do TDM switches require you to license users yearly, like Cisco?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,106
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,106 |
Isn't this horse dead yet?
From what little I know VoIP (in-office VoIP as well as trunks) is best suited for the medium business crowd and bigger.
So, if you have less then 100 employees, in my opinion, you are better served by Digital/TDM systems in most cases.
That being said, I do like VoIP over TDM. But I will also qualify that statement by saying I am obviously biased. If you had the knowledge and skill to bend things to your will you would like it too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 582
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 582 |
This Horse will never die.
It will continue to be debated here and other forums for a long time and the dividing line betweem VoIP&TDM supporters, VoIP only supporters and TDM only supporters will probably continue forever as well.
The only change is the dividng line size will change as VoIP replaces TDM.
At the end of the day its what the manufacturers continue to develop and support that will determine what you sell or if you need find something else to do.
This is just natural progression and some of you have already done this transition from 1A2 to Analog TDM (talk about a huge change) and most from Analog TDM to Digital TDM and now to Hybrids with whatever manufacturers you have been representing except now you will have to move from TDM/Digital/Hybrids to VoIP.
So until whatever replaces VoIP comes along it will be system of choice like it or not - so why not adopt it, learn and move your business forward?
As far as the support issues with Cisco they are no diferent than any other large manufacturer and quite honestly we have not had many becuse we took the time and spent the money to gain the competance on the product and the confidence of the clients.
Believe me my team and I have worked on and continue to work on most large PBX's - Siemens, Ericsson, Avaya, Nortel and Alacatel. I think most of the support issues are caused by the manufacturers causing there own problems by rushing everything to market before having full confidence in the SW/HW.
Small key system manufacturers are guilty of this as well but it becomes more pronounced when it is a larger more complex system than a litle 4 x 8 box.
Whether it is 1A2, TDM or IP/VoIP if you are not properly educated in the particular discipline and trained on the product - how can you support it and have competance on the product or even confidence in your self to install and maintain it?
At the end of the day if it weren't for all the people that did not understand simple TDM telephony, forums like Sundance, Cisco Support, PBX-Info, Tek-Tips and others would not be really needed to answer questions and address system faults and complain between each other about manufacturers etc.
All of these forums have great value for the day to day simple questions or brain farts - it happens to all of us.
As far as system competance goes this is where almost everyone gets into trouble thinking because they have past experience on System A they can now support System B - just doesn't work that way very well and if you are crossing disciplines it will never work.
Ride on Dead Horse!
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,426
Posts639,486
Members49,821
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
0 members (),
155
guests, and
23
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|