|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,218 |
Originally posted by jacktucky: I was a little disappointed that I can only get 178Kbps download from newsgroups, but I can get all of my work done, and I haven't had an outage yet.
Jack If you have a T1, you should be getting the same up and down.
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 14
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 14 |
What I meant was after install speedtest was testing at 1.5 but downloading from newsgroups tops out at 178kbps. Download and upload are usually the same, but today Speedtest.net is showing a slight difference. I have QOS turned on on my router so I doubt speedtest would show 1.5 anymore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,347 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,347 Likes: 4 |
Gee, used to be that a T1 was the gold standard for speed. And here I am complaining about my lousy speed. <a href="https://www.speedtest.net"> </a>
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Some comments made by me are known to the State of California to cause irreversible brain damage and serious mental disorders leading to confinement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 289
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 289 |
jacktucky, if you consistently get ping timings over 200ms, you may want to give ATT Worldnet a call.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 575
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 575 |
And this is one to the Owensboro server: Seems like I'm getting double your numbers and half the ping time, and I'm 700 miles farther away.
Rob Cashman Customer Support Engineer
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 289
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 289 |
Unfortunately, ISPs are not obligated to provide low latency in connections, unlike their obligations re:bandwidth. But they should be able to provide more efficient routing (if they want to keep you as a customer?) This is a nifty tool, the lite version is free. Try the "live" demo: web page
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 38 |
Im getting some pretty crappy speed here too.
Brandon C.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,058 Likes: 5
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
|
Moderator-1A2, Cabling
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,058 Likes: 5 |
https://www.speedtest.net/result/370779344.png Wireless I'm getting 15/5 No complaints about Fios Sam
"Where are we going and why are we in this hand basket?"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,428 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,428 Likes: 1 |
Just ran a speed test here in the office at school. The computer is slooow but I guess our internet isn't bad!
Jeff Moss Moss Communications Computer Repair-Networking-Cabling MBSWWYPBX, JGAE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31 |
Originally posted by arc: I was looking over some pinout charts, and noticed that the RJ-48C seems to be the same as the RJ-48X jack except for the shorting bars. It says here that both of those jacks are for 1.544 Mbps data service. Where would you use the RJ-48C (without the shorting bars) instead of the RJ-48X (with the shorting bars)?
Is "1.544 Mbps data service" always a T1 or PRI line, or is there some other 1.544 Mbps data service out there? Use RJ48X if you can-- the reason is simple. Automatic loopback if you disconnect your side. Benefit: The local CO won't get a LOS/RED Alarm, and they won't OOS your circuit after a period of inactivity.
-- Only the fool fears asking a question.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,428
Posts639,501
Members49,821
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|