|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,347 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,347 Likes: 4 |
Why would someone buy an IP Office knowing they have to buy licenses, when they can buy open source without license restrictions? Why the change from the old days when you just had to add hardware to expand?
It really isn't any different now and you know I would be the first to agree with you if you were correct. You add hardware same as before. Sometimes you already have the hardware and need a license to activate features. Take VM ports. Didn't you have to buy a license to expand the VM capacity even back with the Mail VS? How about the Partner Voice Messaging PC card- for up to 4 mailboxes you buy the small. Need more, buy the large. Need ASA buy an ASA card. What's the difference if capabilities are already built in and you have to buy a license to activate them vs buying a physical card or firmware?
And you really can't compare Asterisk to the IPO. Pretty much like comparing Yugo to Ford.
-Hal
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Some comments made by me are known to the State of California to cause irreversible brain damage and serious mental disorders leading to confinement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,350
RIP Admin
|
RIP Admin
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,350 |
My biggest problem is that it doesn't support more Partner sets, as you know your not going to get a fuzzy feeling from a customer when you tell him in order to upgrade from your current ACS you will only be able to use 18 of your 34 sets, it would be much easier to sell if it were truly backward compatible.
Russ runs a local service and private tech center. [/url]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
|
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630 |
Originally posted by hbiss: Why would someone buy an IP Office knowing they have to buy licenses, when they can buy open source without license restrictions? Why the change from the old days when you just had to add hardware to expand?
It really isn't any different now and you know I would be the first to agree with you if you were correct. You add hardware same as before. Sometimes you already have the hardware and need a license to activate features. Take VM ports. Didn't you have to buy a license to expand the VM capacity even back with the Mail VS? How about the Partner Voice Messaging PC card- for up to 4 mailboxes you buy the small. Need more, buy the large. Need ASA buy an ASA card. What's the difference if capabilities are already built in and you have to buy a license to activate them vs buying a physical card or firmware?
And you really can't compare Asterisk to the IPO. Pretty much like comparing Yugo to Ford.
-Hal With the IP Office you have to buy the hardware and licenses to expand. Now I would prefer an IP Office because of its ability to handle TDM sets. But outside of that, tell me what advantage does a customer gain by going IP Office verses Asterisk? Its difficult to convince a customer to spend twice as much for basically the same capabilities. Another thing that is being slightly overlooked is that licensing is tied to each individual customoer. There won't be any reselling of used equipment outside of the phones.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
|
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630 |
Originally posted by dtmf: My biggest problem is that it doesn't support more Partner sets, as you know your not going to get a fuzzy feeling from a customer when you tell him in order to upgrade from your current ACS you will only be able to use 18 of your 34 sets, it would be much easier to sell if it were truly backward compatible. I agree Russ. We too have a lot of partner systems out there that are maxed out and these guys want to use their old stuff. I will say, that I do like the looks of the new 1400 series sets that they came out with.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,347 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,347 Likes: 4 |
Another thing that is being slightly overlooked is that licensing is tied to each individual customoer.
It is??
-Hal
CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Some comments made by me are known to the State of California to cause irreversible brain damage and serious mental disorders leading to confinement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,056
RIP Moderator-Mitel, Panasonic
|
RIP Moderator-Mitel, Panasonic
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,056 |
Oh, really. Funny, I've heard the same about Definity. And yet, I've been involved in the installation of complete used Definity systems. No licensing problems have popped up on them. I will say that they were usually being moved from a closing motel to another property, generally not owned by the same individual/group. I assume the licensing on the secondary market only affects whether or not you can get help from Avaya, and how much it would cost without a 'license'.
When I was young, I was Liberal. As I aged and wised up, I became Conservative. Now that I'm old, I have settled on Curmudgeon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,667 Likes: 4
Moderator-Avaya
|
Moderator-Avaya
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,667 Likes: 4 |
Z-Man, as much as I enjoy your point of view on other threads, I feel you are completely off base here. You are trying to compare a FREE pbx to an IP Office. That is like arguing between CentOS (free Linux OS) and Windows.
NOW, back on topic. Ron, I do appreciate the opportunity you have given this board by opening this thread.
Do you have some input on the feasibility of some of the features that people have requested here?
Quick recap of features: Adding a vpn phone or 2 to Partner Edition Centrex transfer Huntgroup Login/out Browser management Password protect AA Menus Increase ETR capacity above 18 Partner sets on IPO Auto System Answer (ASA)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
|
Moderator-Avaya, Nortel
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,630 |
Zane, lets keep this thread on topic and not turn it into a debate or a discussion about comparison. You have made you point very clear, but the OP was simply asking for input and you have made your point very clear.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 438
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 438 |
Ron, Great thread. If I recall right abouit 50% of all customers are 10 phones and under. In my rural market it is 50% of the customers are 6 phones and under. A few years ago you introduced a Partner SOE that sold here like hotcakes. We could be in the same ball park as the other brands for the 4 phone dentist office. We made bank. And increased market share. The smaller configs just are not price competitive as far as I can see. I would like a smaller, cheaper, maybe limited license, Partner Version for the simple 4 to 7 phone market place. Any chance of helping us out here?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 438
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 438 |
Think of your travel stop (3 lines 4 phones and overhead paging). They have a couple thousand to spend. (I was just at one of our customers this weekend). The Version is about 50% than the SOE- maybe double the price. I would caution this- dont make the Version too complicated. The IPOffice is for customers that want complicated. The Version I thought was for inexpensive simple installations. From a sales point, give us something easy to use and demo, cheap to install, and quick to sell.
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,431
Posts639,513
Members49,821
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|