|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,021
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,021 |
Greetings,
To use certain features on voicemail the client opted not to have International service from their carrier on their PRI. They got a call from At&t fraud and their carrier about suspected fraudulent international calls. At&t believes their PIC code was used. The client asked me why their carrier would allow a PIC code to be dialed, and why At&t would allow the calls with out them having an account? Thoughts?
John 807
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,290 |
Ummm...sure, I have thoughts.
AT&T are imbeciles, crooks and devoted to furthering their cellular-based racket, to the exclusion of any cogent or responsible action on behalf of their other subscribers.
Arthur P. Bloom
"30 years of faithful service...15 years on hold"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 8
Spam Hunter
|
|
Spam Hunter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 8 |
IXCs may allow casual dialing up to a certain point before blocking an ANI.
If arrangements are in place, the LEC would bill the end user on behalf of the IXC.
I Love FEATURE 00
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,309 Likes: 8
Moderator-Avaya, Polycom
|
|
Moderator-Avaya, Polycom
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,309 Likes: 8 |
Your lec may use AT&T to process some calls.
As far as. Pic code, I don't think a lec can block that.
Your pbx has to.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,021
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,021 |
In English piease. The client said no International calls. They had no arrangement with At&t for international calls so why did their carriar and At&t allow them through? And why do both of them think I'm on the hook for the calls? BTW the client doesn't believe it and their legal is involved.
John 807
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 8
Spam Hunter
|
|
Spam Hunter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,181 Likes: 8 |
The IDDD blocking would, likely, occur in the IXC's switch as opposed to the LEC's switch.
Because at&t has no association with the end user, there would be no restrictions on the customer's ANI in at&t's IXC switch.
I Love FEATURE 00
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,171 Likes: 18
Admin
|
|
Admin
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,171 Likes: 18 |
What make of phone system does the customer have? Does it use ARS?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,021
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,021 |
It is an old Norstar 0x32. I had forwarned them years ago this could happen based on what they wanted to do. They said their carrier would allow no International calls. I looked at the restriction table on the mail ports and I'm restrocting 0 and 1. I put the restriction table on the sets and couldn't get out where they got by placing the restrictions on a set. How did they do it? I have my guess.
John 807
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,309 Likes: 8
Moderator-Avaya, Polycom
|
|
Moderator-Avaya, Polycom
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,309 Likes: 8 |
Who is the carrier and who choose the carrier
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,347 Likes: 10
Moderator-Avaya-Lucent, Antique Tele
|
|
Moderator-Avaya-Lucent, Antique Tele
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,347 Likes: 10 |
They either prefixed the international number with 1010288 to get to AT&T, or they prefixed 1-800-225-5277 to do the same.
Block 101XXX, and block 1800/1888/1877/etc for the voicemail ports
|
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,466
Posts639,686
Members49,828
| |
Most Online5,661
May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image]](https://sundance-communications.com/forum/images/559.jpg)
