|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1 |
I have 2 CIX 40's connected using IP QSIG , site A wants there calls to ring on a delay to site B . I have tried adding the Extensions at site B that they want to ring on a delay to the MCG at site A , and it will only let me add 1 EXT. and it never rings.I tried adding Site B's MCG to ring on a delay in site A's MCG , NO RING.I can DIT the lines from site A to site B using siteB's MCG. Any ideas ?????
|
|
|
Visit Atcom to get started with your new business VoIP phone system ASAP
Turn up is quick, painless, and can often be done same day.
Let us show you how to do VoIP right, resulting in crystal clear call quality and easy-to-use features that make everyone happy!
Proudly serving Canada from coast to coast.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,314
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,314 |
Are your network DN tables up to date?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1 |
Yes a just doubled checked them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,314
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,314 |
When you add the 1 ext, does it actually ring that ext? For some reason I don't think it works to add PDN's from a remote node to a local MCG. I wanna say I ran into this before but can't recall the actual scenario and what the fix was. You could try creating a pilot DN that is directed to the remote node MCG and add that to the local MCG on the delay :shrug: Or how about creating a PhDN and forward that to the remote MCG, add the PhDN to the local MCG on the delay.
Im just guessing here, not sure if either of these scenarios will work.
Edit: Disregard my first sentence, I just re-read the original post and that was already answered.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 323
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 323 |
Had same situation had to use PHDN and foward it to DN or PHDN on remote node... mcgs will not ring a phantom across nodes..
just another reason to dislike mcgs
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,719 Likes: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,719 Likes: 7 |
As far as I have heard, there is no way to have a call ring on multiple sites at the same time through QSig, no matter what you put in the MCG.
I have run into it and read many message comments about it, and I have not heard of a solution. A while back someone claimed to have a work-around but never posted it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,719 Likes: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,719 Likes: 7 |
Originally posted by www.telcom1.net: Had same situation had to use PHDN and foward it to DN or PHDN on remote node... mcgs will not ring a phantom across nodes..
just another reason to dislike mcgs Forwarding the call across a QSig will work. You just can't ring 2 phones at 2 sites at the same time. And MCG will only ring the owner of a phantom, even at the same node.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1 |
I broke down and called tech support , there is no way to have a call ring on multiple sites at the same time through QSIG , I thnk I am going to have the calls ring a MCG on site A ,then setup a system call forward for that MCG (BNA) to site B's MCG.Anyone see why this wouldn't work ??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 810
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 810 |
I replied to your pm but thought you just wanted to forward calls not ring simultaneously. The only way to have calls ring at the same time over qsig is using mas with the vm application and the simultaneous ring feature flex package.
Pat Austin Teleco Inc. Product Manager/Sales Engineer Adtran ATSP TCTE/CTP Certified Teleco Homepage
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,266 Likes: 1 |
I thnk I am going to have the calls ring a MCG on site A ,then setup a system call forward for that MCG (BNA) to site B's MCG.Anyone see why this wouldn't work ??
UPDATE: This worked for me
|
|
|
Forums84
Topics94,466
Posts639,686
Members49,828
|
Most Online5,661 May 23rd, 2018
|
|
|
|